Skip to main content
File #: 25-1278    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Action Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 7/31/2025 In control: Board of Zoning Appeals
On agenda: 8/28/2025 Final action:
Title: Request by Thomas Mainville, Story Hill Renovations, for a front setback variance at 3359 N. Menomonee River Parkway to construct an entry portico
Attachments: 1. 3359 Menomonee River Parkway, 2. Plan Set, 3. Variance Description_v1 (1), 4. Site Plan_v1 (2)
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

title
Request by Thomas Mainville, Story Hill Renovations, for a front setback variance at 3359 N. Menomonee River Parkway to construct an entry portico

 

body

Submitted by:

Art Piñon

Department:

Development

 

A.                     Issue

The applicant is requesting a variance to the front yard setback requirement for a portico on an existing single-family residence located at 3359 N. Menomonee River Parkway in the Single Unit Residential-9 (R1-9) zone.

 

The required front yard setback for an attached portico is the same as the principal dwelling unit, which is 35’, and the applicant is proposing a front setback of 31’4”.

 

It should be noted that the City is considering less restrictive front porch setback stanadards with the upcoming Zoning Ordinance Update. If approved, the proposed portico would be permitted without a variance approval.

 

Attached to this report are project plans, site plan/survey, letter addressing the four variance findings in accordance with WMC 24.16.060.H, and site aerial.

 

 

B.                     Recommendation

The standard four criteria should be applied to make the determination for the requested variances:

1.                     Exceptional circumstances do exist pertaining to this lot.

2.                     That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the property rights possessed by other properties in the district and vicinity.

3.                     That the variance will not create special detriment to adjacent property and will not materially impair or be contrary to the purpose and spirit of this or to the public interests.

4.                     That the difficulty or hardship was not created by the property owner.